Cenários

Adjusting contracts, hiring people, losing a client, taking credit. Each of these decisions changes the result and the cash in a different way — and the effect is almost never what intuition says.

At the top, the result band: cash at the end of the horizon in the base scenario, the worst cash in the pessimistic one, cash in the optimistic one and how many months close negative. Just below, the model's own historical error — the projection always appears alongside how much it usually misses. In the tabs: the levers (the decisions this scenario tests), sensitivity (what moves the result most), the projected DRE and cash, and month by month.

Every projection comes out in pessimistic, base and optimistic. In the pessimistic one revenue falls AND expenses rise, because that is how a bad month really happens — not just by selling less. The distance between them comes from the error your company has historically made, not from a guess.

Each driver is shaken in isolation, ten percent up and down. The order tends to surprise: companies that discuss price at every meeting sometimes discover that the result responds much more to the collection period.

Use it to test "what if I invest 200 thousand for 90 days?". The amount leaves available cash and becomes locked cash — the company's equity does not change, liquidity does, and that difference is what the projection starts to show. Fill in the start date (investment), the redemption date and the monthly yield rate; in the redemption month the principal returns to available cash plus the yield for the period. A negative amount redeems an existing investment.

Use it to test a receipt or payment in foreign currency and the effect of the currency fluctuating. Pay attention to the amount field: it is in the CHOSEN CURRENCY, not in reais (5,000 with currency USD = five thousand dollars). The start date is the settlement date, and the % variation stresses the exchange rate — 15 means the currency 15% more expensive at settlement, -10 means 10% cheaper.

Since 09/18/2026 the scenario list is the same as all registries — search, filters (type, status, investment, confidential), export and trash with Undo. Clicking a scenario opens the record with the full cockpit. The "New scenario" panel remains here because creating freezes the current state of the company; and so does the comparison of up to four scenarios, because it compares the company with itself.

Type is the decision (hire, adjust price, invest, take credit, exchange...); Amount and "starting from" say how much and since when. Redemption, currency, exchange variation and monthly rate only apply to treasury levers — the other types ignore them. Price per item asks for the second number (the item's base); without it the lever produces no effect, on purpose.

In the levers tab, the row pencil opens the same Add dialog, already filled in: fix the type, value or dates and save — the lever is saved on the same row and the projection is redone. If data is missing (type, date, currency or rate), the dialog stays open for you to complete.

A scenario that chases the live database changes its result on its own between two visits. We freeze the company's snapshot at the moment of creation, so that reopening the August simulation in November shows the same numbers.

An adjustment in October does not change September. It seems obvious, and it is the most common mistake in scenario spreadsheets: the effect enters in the first month and the number looks nice and wrong.

When you add people, the cost comes in full in the first month and the revenue ramps up over the following months. That is why the result gets worse before it gets better — and it is exactly this design that separates an honest projection from an optimistic one.

An approved scenario is no longer a simulation: your targets become the number against which actuals are measured, including at the results meeting. Only one scenario is active at a time, and switching requires stating the reason — changing course is legitimate, erasing the previous course is not.

The platform converts at the exchange rate in force on the chosen date and freezes the rate used in the lever, so the scenario remains auditable later. If there is no rate recorded for that currency and date, the lever is refused with a warning — on purpose. Converting at an arbitrary rate would produce an entire scenario that looks precise and isn't, and nobody would go back to check the rate. Record the rate in Financial › Foreign exchange and try again.

When you save a view with the Views button, it stores four things: the search text, the applied filters, which columns appear (and in what order) and which column the list is sorted by. Applying the view restores everything at once — including resetting the sort and the page you were on, so the result is exactly what the view describes. Views saved before this version remain valid: whatever they didn't store simply doesn't change when applied.

Nas fichas, sair de um campo já dispara a conferência do que dá para conferir na hora: campo obrigatório deixado em branco e e-mail mal formado. O aviso aparece embaixo do campo e desaparece quando você começa a corrigir. Campo numérico não precisa de aviso: ele simplesmente não aceita letra enquanto você digita. Isso é conforto, não a validação final: ao salvar, o sistema confere tudo de novo do lado do servidor.

The fields of the Data tab are read-only on purpose. Add or remove levers and click Project to see the effect; Save projection freezes the result for the dossier and the comparison; Approve turns the draft into the company's current commitment (only one scenario is active at a time). Delete sends it to the trash, with Undo — the decision history is the product, it is never erased.

Yes: mark the scenario as confidential. It becomes visible only to you and to those with owner view, and the filter is applied in the database query — not just hidden on the screen.

Open the record and look at the Timeline on the right: it shows each change as "from one value to another", with the person and the date. When there are many changes, use the two filters at the top of the timeline — one by field, the other by person. The search runs in the database, so old changes show up just the same. You can also ask Tenkai: "who changed contract 482?".